Diario de Pernambuco did a double opinion piece to show opposing views regarding the Novo Recife project. Reading both below, the pro-view from the director of UFPE’s Law School, and the contra from a lawyer, it’s plain to see just how divergent they really are. There’s nothing particularly human about the director’s argument and this makes it a really dry read. The lawyer’s argument, on the other hand, gets to the heart of the issue and thus reads like a real human wrote it. Perhaps the display is an editorial choice done to make the lawyer’s view stand out. Preferably, they should have had two older people dispute the pros and cons, as well as two younger people.
(If you can’t read the articles, click on the images to enlarge them)